The Kite Runner Redemption Free Essays

What is the most exceedingly awful thing you have done to a companion or relative? Have you misled them? Taken from them? After the appalling deed, did they pardon you? All the more critically, did you pardon yourself? Lament and reclamation are significant subjects in the book The Kite Runner. Having lament for something can influence as long as you can remember, as observed with the character, Amir. Through the improvement of Amir and his cherished companion, Hassan, Amir needs to live with his lament and trust in recovery for an incredible remainder. We will compose a custom exposition test on The Kite Runner Redemption or then again any comparable point just for you Request Now From the earliest starting point of the story The Kite Runner, it is evident that Amir accomplished something incorrectly from the absolute first page. Amir says, â€Å"Standing in the kitchen with the beneficiary to my ear, I knew it wasn’t just Rahim Khan on the line. It was my past of unatoned sins. † (1). The peruser comprehends that Amir had accomplished something incorrectly in the winter of 1975. Afterward, we make sense of what this â€Å"something† was; he watched Hassan get assaulted. It was after Amir had quite recently won his kite race and Hassan had gone to bring the triumphant kite. He at that point ran over the domineering jerks of the area: Assef, Kamal, and Wali. Assef attempted to take the kite, yet like a dependable companion, Hassan would not let him. Assef then let Hassan keep the kite, however just to follow through on the cost of being assaulted. Amir remained behind a divider and watched everything occur without saying single word. This is presumably one of the most significant scenes in the entire book; Amir’s activities from this formed how he grew up and carried on with an amazing remainder with lament. After Amir watched Hassan get assaulted, nothing was the equivalent. He was loaded up with blame and lament. He felt like a quitter. â€Å"I ran in light of the fact that I was a weakling. I feared Assef and what he would do to me. I feared getting injured. † (77). He was unable to turn and help his companion since he was frightened, and he needed the endorsement of his dad for once; he thought bringing home the kite would prevail upon Baba. Much to his dismay that he destroyed a mind-blowing remainder by doing this. Amir was loaded up with such lament that he needed to dispose of Hassan somehow. He was unable to stand the mystery that he had from that night and needed the agony to leave. Amir changed his and Hassan’s relationship that night. Significantly after Amir encircled Hassan and got him to leave, Amir’s blame didn't leave and he was always lamenting all the choices he had been making as yet. Amir and Baba wound up going to America to attempt to escape from quite a while ago and get the reclamation the two of them were aching for. In the wake of living in America, Amir got a call from his old companion, Rahim Khan. Rahim Khan had been searching for some reclamation of his own in light of the fact that he had been leaving well enough alone from Amir his entire life; Hassan was really Baba’s child and Amir’s relative. Hassan had kicked the bucket and Rahim needed Amir to recover Hassan’s child, Sohrab. Amir despite everything hefted around the blame from the winter of 1975 and concluded this was his opportunity to vindicate himself. As Rahim Khan stated, â€Å"There was an approach to be acceptable once more. † (2). This was Amir’s approach to be acceptable once more. Amir had been searching for recovery his entire life. Recovering Sohrab would free himself of this. Amir additionally outstepped his defeatist character when he was looked to a fight with Assef. This piece of the book was one of the other most significant scenes. Amir came out with Sohrab and he at last got the reclamation that he was looking for since the day he watched Hassan get assaulted. All through the book there were numerous instances of reclamation. It for the most part happened in Amir as we saw his relationship with Hassan develop all through the book. Amir had such blame that he needed to drive Hassan away; this demonstrated the amount of a quitter he truly was. After that day, he generally hauled around the blame of selling out his companion lastly cleared himself by discovering his recovery while recovering Sohrab. Despite the fact that his choice of being a quitter influenced his life pitiably, it despite everything molded him into the man that he was toward the finish of the book. Hosseini, Khaled. The Kite Runner. New York: Riverhead Books, 2003. The most effective method to refer to The Kite Runner Redemption, Papers

University Land Deal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

College Land Deal - Essay Example His wellsprings of intensity are the way that he knows about $16 million residence that the all-inclusive college had prior arranged, and it was worse than what they needed to auction. He was additionally mindful that there were scarcely any neighborhood properties that could fill in as an examination. Father Farrell additionally realized that the long college needed development of local locations and their place was a helpful one. Father Farrell’s BATNA was the $18.3million which he had haggled before with a business engineer. Father’s RP is $17.8 million since it was the keep going value he had on his options as all the more start on talked about with the board individuals. Her advantage was to get the three quarters since her college required extension region for private. Her wellspring of intensity was the way that St. James School was giving the best spot to private, and she made certain about it. Her BATNA would be $16 million she had involvement in another

The Mathematics of People

The Mathematics of People == Guest Post by Spencer Pantoja 20 == When I was 14, I “knew” I wanted to be an interior designer. When I was 15, I decided I actually wanted to become an economist. That one actually stuck. My parents come from two very different ways-of-thinking. My dad is a nerdy engineer with a masters degree, who loves psychology, studies/practices Buddhist spirtuality, and lives in his head. My mom is a former bartender and studied at “the Holiday Inn University”. She also has 25 fiction books checked out from the library and is probably trying to make a shelter for the local squirrels right now. Over the years, I realized that my brain very much functions like my dad, but often is more drawn to things like my mom. I now love talking to people, understanding their emotions, thoughts, and desires. In middle school, I was quiet, and I would just observe how people were interacting with each other from afar, and I started to learn very purposefully how to on my own. I was always very reflective and sought out people who were different from me. I was always very constant in my emotions, so much so that it really had bothered me for a long time that my emotions didn’t seem to work like the people I cared about the most. I’m now a practicing Buddhist, and after meditations I try to use my clear head to focus on and bring out my emotions and try to understand them. And so I have to do something that spends my thoughts focused on people. And so with this mathematicians brain, I discovered Economics, or “the mathematics of people”. It just took a random idea when I was in 9th grade that happened to play out. I was sitting in my Algebra class, I was really bored, and somehow came up with the idea of learning calculus. I had never heard of anyone doing this before, didn’t really know that self-teaching was a thing, and entirely ignored the fact that there was a math class in between Algebra and Calculus. I can’t tell you how I came up with this idea or why I thought it would work, but it did and I got hooked on OCW. I had heard about economics from my older brother and started taking a ton of economics classes. I took classes like principles of microeconomics, macroeconomics, microeconomic policy, intermediate microeconomics, game theory, and advanced competitive strategy all online. And if it weren’t for OCW, there would’ve been nothing else on my application that could’ve gotten me into MIT. Because of the OCW preparation, I got to jump right into the graduate program’s curriculum this year. I’m taking the Microeconomic Theory core, Industrial Organization I-II, and Game Theory (14.126). While one of my favorite things about economics is how varied it is, I do find myself drawn to the micro theory side. In particular, I love learning about systems of people, from how individuals make decisions, to how organizations make decisions, and all the way to how it translates into a market with game theoretic strategy structures. So when you go to Verdes at 2 am, I can talk about why Verdes is placed where it is with the times it’s open, how it chooses its prices, why you seem to face no costs in using your credit card to buy that Arizona tea, why that tea is pre-labeled with “99 ¢â€, what type of person chooses to work at Verdes, and why you are up at 2am doing a PSET when you could’ve not procrastinated it during the day. I’m currently writing a research paper I’m really excited about. This IAP, I traveled to Italy to do research at the University of Sannio about the productivity gap between the North and the South. The North of Italy is much more productive than the South of Italy, and a lot of the gap is still left unexplained in the econometric sense. When I talked to non-economists- travelers of Europe, local Italian students, strangers on public transportation- they almost all reference this cultural attitude difference. They always said something along the lines of “The people in the North are very rigid, strict, and precise while the people in the South are flexible, looser, and more relaxed”. They take longer lunches, have more days off, and of course are nicer about people being late. Living in the South, I noticed this very loose attitude towards time immediately. But I probably read 20 papers on the productivity gap in Italy alone, and not a single one even mentioned this idea. Then I took a train to Naples. The train was delayed, and the local showing us around said “oh, this train is always delayed”. When I got on the train, I had my idea: “what if I used train delay data to capture this cultural attitude?”. How this works is that there is really only one train company in Italy, Trenitalia, so all the stations in Italy would have the same access to technology, business practices, with the same organizational structures. Then if I could use census data to account for other demand factors (like income, age, education, and family-status), and adjusting for some route factors (distance, weather, station crowdedness), what I’m left with is theoretically how much the consumer base values punctuality. If a consumer base really values punctuality, then the station will be more likely to take costly measures to make sure the trains are more punctual. I also came up with a really cool game theory model for punctuality, which was an exercise in translating how people choose their punctuality behavior to mathematical/computational models so I could see what was happening on a larger scale. I model it as a coordination/supermodular game, where people want to be about as punctual as their peers. It’s dynamic, so I have to put in a time component. I also added a memory-loss and a long-term/short-term memory component. Also, in the cultural sense, I assume that people observe (roughly) strangers showing up to places on-time or late, and everyone shows up to places according to random distribution. People do statistical testing in these review/memory periods to catch changes in the populations behavior. And I wanted to see how easy a “punctuality contagion equilibrium shift” could occur in this setting, so I simulated this model within a population using Python. And what seemed to be slowing down this contagion process the most was the fact that for late people, they only get to see that early people arrived before them, but they see the arrival times of the people who arrive after them. So they naturally have more information about late people still being late than do about early people, which makes it so much harder for them to recognize a cultural change especially when the “status-quo” was tardiness. So in this paper, I get to: Learn about the history of Italy Read about cultural dynamics, like the connection of the culture of Japan to there insanely efficient/punctual train system Use behavior psychology to construct a theoretical math model Model this process in Python Construct a regression structure/econometric approach to analyze data in a statistical software package I will never get bored doing economics research because I get to do a little bit of everything, and for the rest of my life I will be doing the mathematics of people. *aside on the Arizona tea*: Basically it’s an attempt by them to reduce the double marginalization problem of vertical structures, which basically means that given that Arizona is selling their drinks “wholesale” for $x per drink, they want the retailers to sell it for as low price as possible, so that there is a higher quantity sold and such the retailer has to buy more from Arizona. And so that’s also why it’s the cheapest thing at Verdes. I’m guessing the reason other drinks don’t do it is for whatever reason Arizona has more bargaining power, such that there isn’t a competitive enough ice tea such that verdes would just start carrying a different brand of ice tea instead so they could mark it up more* === Spencer is a good friend and on the Undergraduate Economics Association. He described his experience with Economics so well and hit on so many reasons why I love it too (despite hating and dropping AP Econ in high school). So I hope you enjoyed his journey and feel free to reach out to him and the UEA at [emailprotected] or me at [emailprotected] if you have more questions about MIT Economics, the new 6-14 major, or any of the other 14 majors! Post Tagged #Course 14 - Economics #Course 6-14

John Locke The Second Treatise Of Government - 1808 Words

John Locke: Discussion 1 While reading the â€Å"The Second Treatise of Government,† you can notice and see that John Locke has a strong standing for civil rights as well as helping with the development of the Constitution of the United States. He states that the â€Å"consent of the governed,† is basically saying that communities are not put together by the divine right or ruled by. Paternal, familial, and political are types of powers that John Locke mentions that have all have unlike characteristics. He inspired others to believe in and want equal rights and democracy. John Locke talks about the state of nature, which basically states that no one has the power to be ruler of someone, as well as they are able to do what they want in a freely matter. In other words people are born just like anyone else that is born, and should have equally rights to property, health, and liberty, and that no one should have the power over anyone. Everyone should be able to live and enjoy his or her own f reedom and wellbeing. However, the state of nature is not a guarantee to have natural laws, which could help with the protecting of one’s property. According to him having your own personal freedom was the true meaning of state of nature. John Locke thought that people were following his faith in human rationality through the declaration of Locke. John Locke states that if the government takes away from others for them to empower them then the people have right and opportunity to go againstShow MoreRelatedThe Second Treatise Of Government By John Locke1593 Words   |  7 Pagessociety. In the publication The Second Treatise of Government, John Locke was the first to promote individualism over society. Though his ideas were considered as liberal, now are embraced by many conservative. John Locke’s ideas are the basis of the American government and so it is important to keep America s nature; the rights of life, liberty to own property, and the pursuit of happiness; at heart when creating laws. In Locke’s second treatise of government, John Locke described that to understandRead MoreJohn Locke : The Second Treatises Of Government2344 Words   |  10 PagesJohn Locke was an incredibly encouraging figure in the development of the ideals and methods of political functioning in the United States of America. John Locke applied many of his studies to write one of his most famous and moving works. â€Å"The Second Treatises of Government† is the document which ultimately struck the United States in their creation of the Declaration of Independence. In Locke’s work he had focused on the idea that governments shouldn’t be dictated by anyone person, but ultimatelyRead MoreJohn Locke s The Second Treatise Of Government918 Words   |  4 PagesJohn Locke’s ‘The Second Treatise of Government’, is a book which narrates his key ideologies, helping to underscore the primary reason for being regarded as the â€Å"father of Classical Liberal ism†. Classical Liberalism, although having been on the rise for some time, was given its concrete foundation by Locke. Essentially, in his text, Locke conveys his interpretation of what certain aspects of classical liberalism, such as liberty, property, and entail. A fundamental principle of Locke’s book isRead MoreIn The Second Treatise Of Government, John Locke Offers1637 Words   |  7 PagesIn the Second Treatise of Government, John Locke offers a theory of human beings as owners of their own persons and labor, and of a natural right to property, which is the function of civil society to protect. In the Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Rousseau argues that â€Å"private property is an artificial creation and the source of crimes, wars, miseries, and horrors† (Rousseau. p. 62). Locke and Rousseau have radically different conclusions after beginning from seemingly similar views on laborRead MoreJohn Locke s Second Treatise Of Government1322 Words   |  6 PagesJohn Locke’s Second Treatise of Government is one of the most influential works in the modern political canon. In the wake of the English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution, Locke analyzes the origins and duties of government. Locke’s ideas of ina lienable rights and natural equality are the classical enunciation of liberalism. His writings have impacted political institutions across the globe, including the American Constitution. In this paper, I will argue that, although Locke’s conception ofRead MoreJohn Locke s The Second Treatise Of Civil Government977 Words   |  4 PagesMadeline Boche Dr. Thorn Philosophy 1301.040 24 March 2017 John Locke’s The Second Treatise of Civil Government In John Locke’s The Second Treatise of Civil Government, Locke discusses what the moral state of nature is and rejects the idea of a â€Å"divine right of kings.† John Locke was a product of the best schools in England and had a heavy impact on Western thought through his writings. As a Christ Church graduate, Locke largely discusses in his writings the state of nature, the concept of naturalRead MoreJohn Locke: Second Treatise of Civil Government Essay900 Words   |  4 PagesCivil Government and Locke The Second Treatise of Government provides Lockes theorizes the individual rights and involvement with the government; he categorizes them in two areas -- natural rights theory and social contract. 1.Natural state; rights which human beings are to have before government comes into being. 2.Social contact; when conditions in natural state are unsatisfactory, and theres need to develop society into functioning of central government. Political Power and NaturalRead MoreJohn Locke: Second Treatise of Civil Government Essay1081 Words   |  5 Pages John Locke was born on August 29, 1632, into a middle class family during late Renaissance England. Locke started his studies at Christ Church in Oxford. He then went into medical studies and received a medical license, which he practiced under Anthony Cooper. They became friends, and when Cooper became Earl of Shaftesbury, Locke was able to hold minor government jobs and became involved in politics. Shaftesbury steered Locke towards the views of a government whose law was fair to all, and all wereRead MoreThomas Hobbes And John Locke s Leviathan And Second Treatise Of Government1852 Words   |  8 PagesHobbes vs. Locke This paper will compare and contrast the beliefs of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke expressed in Leviathan and Second Treatise of Government. The paper will show the basic differences between the two philosophers views, is Hobbes distrust of the people and Locke s relatively greater trust of the people and distrust of the government s power and the likelihood of the abuse of that power. Hobbes view in Leviathan aims at ensuring civil order, which means for him the absolute powerRead MoreAnalysis and Historical Context from Second Treatise of Civil Government by John Locke1152 Words   |  5 PagesCOMMENTARY OF ‘SECOND TREATISE OF CIVIL GOVERNMENT’: The previous fragment we’ve read belongs to the work of John Locke, ‘Second Treatise of Civil Government’, who published it anonymously in 1689. It is a work of political philosophy, in which Locke talks about civil society, natural rights and separation of powers. Locke was one of the first empirical philosophers and he believed that the human being was born with no knowledge, and that experience and observation were the base of all human wisdom

The Bell Jar By Sylvia Plath And The Catcher Of The Rye

People often inquire who they are; when asked a question such as this one, they hesitate. They consider every possible answer, despite their response being so obvious. A person is made up of three major parts- their personality, the cultures that mold their personality, and their dreams. These three components are analyzed within the novels, The Bell Jar by Sylvia Plath and the Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger. These themes contribute to the evolution and demolition of characters, leading to events that create thrill within the two. In the novel, The Bell Jar, the prime character, Esther Greenwood, struggles to handle life in her own skin. She feels trapped in a glass bell jar with no escape because of her incapability to comprehend herself. For example, in chapter one Plath states, â€Å"‘My name s Elly Higginbottom,’ I said. ‘I come from Chicago.’ After that I felt safer. I didn t want anything I said or did that night to be associated with me and my real name and coming from Boston† (Plath 11). In this quote, Esther alters her life story demonstrating her lost sight of her true identity. In addition, Greenwood talks about losing control over her life as a wicked cloud rolls in, shadowing her every move. To further explain, Greenwood voices, â€Å"Only I wasn t steering anything, not even myself. I just bumped from my hotel to work and to parties and from parties to my hotel and back to work like a numb trolleybus. I guess I should have been excited the way most of the otherSh ow MoreRelatedComparison Of Depression In The Catcher In The Rye And The Bell Jar712 Words   |  3 Pagescases were Sylvia Plath and J.D Salinger. Sylvia Plaths The Bell Jar and J.D. Salingers The Catcher in the Rye express two teenagers attempts to escape from repressive situations as well as the discoveries they make about humanity while ultimately discovering the insights they gain into themselves. Much too often, individuals, especially teenagers, are placed in situations where they are restrained from doing certain things or acting a certain way. Both Holden Caulfield from The Catcher in theRead MoreThe Bell Jar By Sylvia Plath1274 Words   |  6 Pagesnovel The Bell Jar by Sylvia Plath the prime character, Esther Greenwood, struggles to handle life in her own skin. She feels as though she is trapped in a glass bell jar with no escape because of her incapability to comprehend herself. For example, in chapter one Plath states, â€Å"‘My name s Elly Higginbottom,’ I said. ‘I come from Chicago.’ After that I felt safer. I didn t want anything I said or did that night to be associated with me and my real name and coming from Boston† (Plath 11). In thisRead MoreUnreliable Narrator Of John Allen Poe s The Catcher Rye 1326 Words   |  6 Pagesreader. They might be unable to distinguish between reality and imagination. Or, they are stricken with insanity. Edgar Allen Poe’s character Montresor is a prime example of an unreliable narrator. As is J. D. Salinger’s Holden Caulfield in The Catcher in Rye. However, it can be difficult to distinguish between what is a reliable narrator, and what is not. An unreliable narrator is one who cannot be trusted to tell the story in a factual manner. Their narration should be taken with a grain of saltRead More Present the way in which imprisonment is presented in The Bell Jar1960 Words   |  8 Pagesis presented in The Bell Jar The bell jar is an inverted glass jar, generally used to display an object of scientific curiosity. Present the way in which imprisonment is presented in ‘The Bell Jar’ The bell jar is an inverted glass jar, generally used to display an object of scientific curiosity, contain a certain kind of gas, or maintain a vacuum. For Esther, the bell jar symbolizes madness. When gripped by insanity, she feels as if she is inside an airless jar that distorts her perspectiveRead MoreThe Hippie Counterculture Movement1751 Words   |  8 Pagescalamity everywhere; these children had their innocence taken at such a young age that they were hesitant to cross the door of adulthood. Holden Caufield struggles with his transition from adolescence to adulthood evident in the 1950s novel Catcher in the Rye. His inner tension stems from his unsuccessful approach in connecting with people condensing him into a lonesome character who fosters psychological issues. His problem, however, arises from the childhood trauma of losing his brother Andy. ThisRead MoreBelonging Essay4112 Words   |  17 Pagesorg/wiki/Cry,_the_beloved_country Picoult, Jodi My sister’s keeper AF Pilkington, Doris Home to mother JF Plath, Sylvia The bell jar AF Prichard, Katherine Coonardoo AF Rhys, Jean The wide Sargasso sea AF Rosoff, Meg Just in case YA Rosoff, Meg What I was YA Rushdie, Salman The satanic verses AF Sachar, Louis Holes JF http://www.louissacha r.com/HolesBook.htm Salinger, J. D. The catcher in the rye AF YA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Catcher_in_the_Rye Sartre, Jean Paul Nausea AF Sebold, Alice TheRead MoreLiterary Criticism : The Free Encyclopedia 7351 Words   |  30 Pages(1929)[29] Gone with the Wind, by Margaret Mitchell (1936) Their Eyes Were Watching God by Zora Neale Hurston (1936) Native Son by Richard Wright (1940) A Tree Grows in Brooklyn by Betty Smith (1943) The Green Years by A. J. Cronin (1944) The Catcher in the Rye, by J. D. Salinger (1951)[30] The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (for plot character Eustace Scrubb) by C. S. Lewis (1952) Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison (1952) In the Castle of My Skin, by George Lamming (1953)[31] Goodbye, Columbus, by Philip

Rhetorical Analysis Free Essays

Sharmil Whyatt March 6, 2012 English Rhetorical Analysis of Song Lyrics My song of choice is, Wale. â€Å"Bad†. Folarin. We will write a custom essay sample on Rhetorical Analysis or any similar topic only for you Order Now Maybach Music, 2012. Mixtape. This song since hitting the mixtape scene is being played all of the time and is being sung by people all over the world. A rhetorical analysis is when you break down a text and try to understand the deeper meaning that you think it might mean. This is helpful because it allows you to do two things, further understand the text and also make sure that you understand what you are learning about. I choose this song for a couple of reasons, one it was stuck in my head the day the assignment was announced, two I really do like the song and I think that people can relate to it, and finally a friend of mine said that this song defines me. I took this opportunity to get to better understand what Wale might be trying to say in this song. I think that this song as excellent example of logos, ethos, and pathos that many people can relate to. The word logos is used to appeal to the readers common sense, also their beliefs and values. I think that Wale is trying to say that if you believe in love then you should also be able to believe in fucking. The beginning hook of the song speaks for its self â€Å"Is it bad that I never made love, no I never did I, but I sure know how to fuck†( Tiara Thomas Hook). If you ask anyone they will tell you there is a complete difference between making love and fucking. When I asked my roommate about the two she defines making love and I quote â€Å"Something that is passionate and soft with nothing but love and care in each other’s eyes†. She defined fucking as â€Å"Two people who only care for each other in that moment, you only need them to please and then they can leave†. At the end of the day everybody is looking for love, he even says at the beginning of the song that â€Å"Monogamy or whatever you call it†¦ain’t for everybody† (Wale Intro) but if you’re not making love then your fucking. Yea you might have those little emotions that you think it might be real but when you find out it’s not you go out and look to find what we call in this generation as a rebound or a fuck buddy. The word ethos is when you use the words or reputation of the artist or writer to support your ideas. Wale is a very smart individual, even though he didn’t graduate from college he was a student athlete. I think that this song is more like him putting his emotions out about himself. That he has never actually made love that he has only fucked women. I think that he telling it all to us in this one line â€Å"Most of us rushing into it anyways, you know what I’m saying†. I also think that he is throwing a curve ball when he says that â€Å"You ain’t rushing for love, and I ain’t up here to judge†. That maybe he once was in love but he and this woman never had their love go to an intimacy level. I have been in love before but when me and my partner where together it was never we were making love it was we were fucking. You can call it what you want but at the end of the day when you are no longer with them you look back on it, you realize that it wasn’t love. The word pathos is when you use your feelings, emotions, and inner thought to influence people. I think that Wale might be trying to tell us of his inner emotions. I am not completely sure if he is trying to tell us that he is ready to make love or if he wants to continue down his path of just fucking women. In the lines â€Å"I don’t need emotions to open your deep sea, I can see the ocean by going between legs†. In this line I think that he has made up his mind that he will just get this emotion that he seeks from in between a woman legs. It’s almost as though he is having a relationship and the vagina (in between legs) is that thing that you don’t want to lose. It’s just like that relationship where you are with someone and they tell you that if you don’t do things there way you risk them leaving you. Wale is using his desire of vagina to keep the girls coming back, it’s possible that the females that he has been choosing all want to make love but he will not let it get to that level. Wale or the female of his choice just take what they need and then leave. In conclusion I have learned the difference between ethos, pathos, and logos. I had learned about it every year of English but with doing this assignment I have a better knowledge of it because I had to actually do something with what I learned. This song might be more important than we actually think because it makes you think. It makes you think about your past and you future and where you might want to go with it. The song gives you an in-depth look into the soul of Wale and how he feels about certain things. I you now my generation we don’t really listen to music anymore. An when I say that I mean the lyrics what the artist is actually trying to say. The only thing we hear is a catchy hook and base line that can make you shake your head and shake your butt. I think that Drake said it best though â€Å"When you are happy you hear the music, but when you are sad you hear the lyrics†. Works Cited Thomas , Kelson , Tiara Thomas , and Wale . â€Å"Wale aâ‚ ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" Bad Lyrics | Rap Genius. † Discover the Meaning of Rap Lyrics | Rap Genius. N. p. , 30 Dec. 2012. Web. 7 Mar. 2013. . MLA formatting by BibMe. org. How to cite Rhetorical Analysis, Papers Rhetorical Analysis Free Essays Sometimes life gets tough and gives us obstacles and challenges just to see how we overcome them. It only takes one mistake for someone’s life to be turned upside down. Watching people go through hardships and life challenges helps us get on the right path and succeed. We will write a custom essay sample on Rhetorical Analysis or any similar topic only for you Order Now The book The Other Wes Moore written by Wes Moore himself, is based on real life challenges that two boys ironically with the same name and hometown were faced with and how their decisions on overcoming them lead them to two completely different places. One living free and being able to experience things and the other living unfortunately behind bars. Wes Moore uses the rhetorical appeals ethos, logos, and pathos to engage the readers attention on how two boys with so many similarities can grow up and live two completely opposite lives. Wes Moore is a talented and educated man and accomplished an enormous amount of things while growing up. He was a Rhodes Scholar and was recognized in the Hall of Fame, but that never fazed him it just made him want to achieve bigger and better things. He looked past that and reached out to someone whose life didn’t go as planned. By doing this he gave the other Wes Moore something to live for, something that would help him forget his past and make him feel like he was a good person again. Wes Moore wrote this book to inspire people and let them learn from other people’s mistakes. He clearly found a wide range of audiences since his book became a New York Times Best seller. This book was made for anyone going through a tough time, struggling for hope, or just an excellent book to read. Wes Moore’s intentions for this book was to show people not to give up on themselves and anythings possible. People choose their own destiny, that you can be what you want to be, so don’t give up even if you hit a pump in the road. Wes Moore studied at two distinguished universities, first John Hopkins then Oxford University where he received a full scholarship. He strongly shows his intelligence by his language and his choice of vocabulary which helps the book appeal to all ages. Moore makes it clear, in the introduction, that this book was written to â€Å"use our two lives as a way of thinking about choices and accountability† (xiv) and not a way to supply excuses for the tragedy that happened on February 7, 2000. This quote and the whole last paragraph in the introduction demonstrates ethos right from the beginning. The way Wes Moore doesn’t judge the other Moore for what he has done and the way Wes Moore interacts with the audience to make sure they do the same shows his credibility. He knows what the other Moore did was a terrible and hurtful thing and tore many family and friends apart, but he wanted his audience to learn from this tragedy and from Moore’s mistakes. In the end, he wanted to show his audience that you can come from hardships in life and still better yourself, but you just need to get up and try. Since the author decided to make his appeal to logos more deeper and complex it was difficult to identify it through the text. Wes Moore can make an argument that the two boys grew up with similar home lives by looking at different relationships within the families. Since Wes Moore, the author, was a little boy he was making decisions on his own and being the man of the house. His father passed away when Moore was at a young age so he never had a male role model. He only had his mother to look up to who was still growing up herself. On the other hand the other Wes Moore had a loving mother who cared dearly about him but at the same time was very young and still trying to figure out her own life. Overall both Wes Moore’s had to overcome tough challenges and make the best of it. This comparison of their relationships with their families helped with the appeal to logos because it showed how two people with similar childhoods can handle almost identical situations differently and end up in complete opposite places. Anyone could read this book and feel emotionally touched by the stories that are told. The author has a strong appeal to pathos throughout the whole book. The audience can either feel shocked by how their lives went in such opposite directions or sorry for the obstacles these boys had to go through growing up. The author decides to start the book with a lot of affection to show the audience that both of these boy’s childhoods were similar and that their lives could of easily been flipped. Wes Moore caught the readers attention at the beginning by trying to get them to figure out how their two lives went in two different directions. Having a strong appeal to pathos is a good benefit because reaching out to the audience through emotion is so much more affective then logic or credibility. People are more connected on how people feel then their knowledge or trustworthiness. For example, when the author said â€Å"HIs body was sprawled and withering at the foot of the stairs† (13), no reader is going to just close the book and stop reading. He or she is going to want to continue reading to figure out why the father died and how the little boy is going to overcome this obstacle. Pathos has a much more affect on the readers then ethos or logos. By reading just the introduction and understanding the lives of these two boys the reader can feel the great amount of emotion put into this book. From the beginning the reader is trapped and doesn’t want to put down the book with the help of the authors use of rhetorical appeals. The differences that lie in their future of these two similar men leaves the audience hanging on what caused so much change in their two lives. How to cite Rhetorical Analysis, Essay examples Rhetorical analysis Free Essays In a letter to the author, analyze an opinionated source that addresses an aspect of pop culture that interests you (see â€Å"Guidelines for Choosing an Appropriate Text† posted under Additional Resources on Model for more information about sources). You will identify the source’s purpose, audience, and context, then evaluate how well the source achieved its purpose by analyzing its rhetorical strategies (such as, but not limited to, appeals, tropes, style and tone, word choice, use of evidence). Why: Strategies of persuasion and argument permeate our culture in advertisements, politics, and even casual conversations among friends about what to do this weekend. We will write a custom essay sample on Rhetorical analysis or any similar topic only for you Order Now The ability to recognize and evaluate this rhetorical overload builds critical thinking skills that identify manipulations and foster informed decision making. Additionally, identifying claims and reasoning, as well as the ability to summarize and paraphrase, is an essential skill in any class that requires responses to reading assignments. This project is designed to address the following course outcomes: monster ability in written analysis, undertake writing as a recursive process that develops and transforms thought, respond appropriately to different kinds of rhetorical situations, adopt appropriate voice, tone, and level of formality. Physical Requirements: Your analysis must be 1200-1500 words in a 12 apt font, double spaced, in a business letter format. Your final folder should include all invention work and rough drafts. Evaluation Criteria: For this assignment, A papers will: meet the physical requirements listed include a clear and precise thesis statement (an analytical claim with reasons about owe the text works) describe the rhetorical context clearly and fairly summarize the main claim explain and analyze how the author builds and presents his/her argument explain and analyze how the author connects with (or fails to connect with) the audience demonstrate audience awareness engage and move the reader be generally free of grammatical errors B papers will mostly meet these criteria; C papers will somewhat meet these criteria; D and F papers will fall short of these criteria Due Dates: Rough drafts will be due in increments as announced in class and posted on Model. How to cite Rhetorical analysis, Papers Rhetorical Analysis Free Essays string(117) " by Hari that he tends to use in or throughout his writing to get an emotion grasp from his audience to his writing\." October 16, 2012 Rhetorical Analysis: â€Å"You are being lied to about pirates† In Johann Hari’s article â€Å"You are being lied to about pirates† (published Monday January 5, 2009 by the Independent) he uncovers for his audience/readers the truth behind piracy and how it is reflected in the ways that the government â€Å"tries† to inform the public. The article shows that his audience is the people he recognizes to be the real villains in destroying the pirate â€Å"organization† as well as the uneducated readers on the topic that are looking to grasp a new understanding of pirates and where it all started. Johann Hari is trying to prove to us that there is definitely more than one side to these Somali pirates, but people just have to be willing to listen to see the truth behind their story. We will write a custom essay sample on Rhetorical Analysis or any similar topic only for you Order Now Johann Hari captured the truth behind piracy in so many ways in his article. In the first paragraph of his essay he states that the British Navy were taking on â€Å"villains† but when reading this you have to sit back and think who really are the villains in this whole situation. Many may believe that the pirates are the villains simply because during the 1650’s through 1730s pirates were portrayed as savages. So it’s easy to agree that the pirates are the evil and corrupt ones, while the British navies are the heroes; but in reality the roles are reversed. In the fourth paragraph in the article, Hari explains that Somalian pirates were the first people in the world to rebel against unjust treatment. Being that Somalia is located on the tip of the Indian Ocean and the Gulf of Aden, this country takes up two bodies of water which gives them plentiful reliable resources of seafood. It’s said in the article that one of the reasons the pirates do what they do, is because of the disappearing of the fish as a result of the Europeans overfishing as well as the deadly outbreak of sickness caused by toxic waste dumping. This nuclear waste dumping began to cause the population to become very sick and they began dying off. This point about the toxic waste shows that when they had enough of the sufferings, and they began to stand together just as our democracy stands as one. The only difference between us and them is the fact that they are doing what they have to do to help the rest of their population survive and are acting in the best interest of their fellow Somalian’s. Hari continues on to explain in the rest of this paragraph that just because they are rebels, does not mean that they can’t behave and live right amongst other cultures and populations. But we must also take a minute to question if high jacking, ransom, kidnapping and murder the right way of living. One thing that really stood out in this article and proved that the pirates are no different than anyone else who are barely hanging on to survive, is in the last paragraph of the article when Hari inputs the conversation between Alexander the Great and a captured pirate. Alexander the Great questioned the pirate why did he have the audacity to rob others, and the pirate smiles and asks him how could he (Alexander the Great) do it? He explained that the only difference between them is the fact that Alexander the Great, this so called emperor, does it in greater numbers but he only does it to small ships. The pirate challenged this great emperor on what is the difference between them. This to me proves that pirates are no different than you or me. Except they actually do something about the problems that are occurring in their lives and they won’t stop until their point is proven. One may say that Johann Hari’s article â€Å"You are being lied to about pirates† is a wake-up call about the truths of piracy and how our government can and withhold information from its citizens. An example of this would be withholding the information on just how the piracy came about, as well as the reasoning behind it. They may also lean towards his article as exploitation on how the government can and will use â€Å"strategic tactics† to sugar-coat or even hide the truth of something from the public. Hari’s main reason for writing this article was to show or in some sense prove that there are always 2 sides to a story (nonsense and the truth) but also there could be two â€Å"truths† in this situation as well. Johann Hari’s cause in writing this article is to try to dispel this â€Å"myth† about how the media stops at nothing to put out a good story, even if that means bending the truth. He explains this in the beginning of his article by sharing the information about the government along with real background history of the Somali pirates. Although he takes this stance in his article we must still remember that Hari falls into the category of a mainstream media personnel, which he sees as the ones who cover up the truth. Being that this is the formal background of who this author is, we must look in depth on just who we are basing our point of views or ideas off of. His credibility falls a little bit shy of the standard of truth, because the author is in fact a reporter and apart of this media machine of sugar-coating things. Because he is a reporter, any and every reporter knows that you sometimes have to twist the truth a little bit to get a good story. Hari is a British journalist who’s been writing for multiple news columns, as well as other side contributions. Over the years he collected numerous awards for being Journalist of the Year, starting back in his college years at Kings College in Cambridge, England. It’s been shown countless of times in articles written by Hari that he tends to use in or throughout his writing to get an emotion grasp from his audience to his writing. You read "Rhetorical Analysis" in category "Papers" The audience of this writer may find it a bit confusing on as to why an author who is making a stand towards the truth of how we are being blinded about Somali pirates has been questioned about his writing credibility. For months now rumors have been circulating about Johann’s reliability as a writer and have been said numerous times that Hari is a plagiarist and has even harassed his rival journalist. On September 15th, 2011 he proved these rumors and accusations to be true, by giving a formal public apology for his actions as well as surrendering his awards for journalist of the year. It’s hard to say whether or not author is knowledgeable about the topic simply because of what he has been accused of and this leaves the audience confused on if what was stated was his truth or his own ingredients to compose this article. In Hari’s defense there is a strong possibility that what was stated in this article was indeed his own work, because he includes a lot of his own emotion and opinion throughout the writing of this article. When interviewing Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah (UN envoy to Somalia) he included the â€Å"grief† that Abdallah was extending when saying that people were constantly dumping nuclear material in his country. Hari felt as though it was his duty to lean more towards an appeal to pathos in order for his audience to get a sense of what he and this envoy were feeling. He was looking for sympathy, disappointment, and a sign of relief in the hopes that through the situations that the Somalian’s were experience they would pull through and overcome this hard and devastating time. Although Hari is taking a stance in siding with the pirates and what they are about he doesn’t shy from including the fact that in the history of piracy, pirates were the first to rebel in the world and shows that rebels can lean towards doing things that the world may see as unjust or cruel, when in reality rebels are people who are tired of taking less than what hey deserve and begin to rise or stand up for what they feel they deserve and that is the point that Hari was trying to make in this article. Johann Hari reached out to his audience about the Somalian piracy and expressed his view on the situation. Hari may have been accused for plagiarism and harassing rival journalist, but when it comes down to it he is a reporter. He’s a reporter who is a par t of this media machine that does whatever it takes to get there point across to their audience. He overcame this obstacle in this article by pushing his emotional appeal (pathos) on his audience giving them an option to choose how to feel about what was being said. The bottom line of this essay is to prove that you can’t always believe what you hear; sometimes you have to do research to get the real truths in a story. Johann Hari tries to elaborate in this article that his audiences are the mislead population who is looking to seek a conformational standpoint on these terrorizing pirates. He also points out to us that his audiences are the ones who have been degrading the name of the Somali pirates. Hari mainly points these types of people out to be the government as well as the corrupted media. He establishes that he is against or does not favor the negative image of the pirates. Hari tries to institute an emotional relationship with his readers by including the â€Å"actual† background of these pirates and gives sympathetic reasoning on why they do the things that they do. Hari incorporates this appeal to pathos in his article because he’s going off the instinct that his readers are looking for some sort of understanding on why they ARE pirates. He maximizes his creative intuition in this article by incorporating his audience by asking us rhetorical questions and giving us reasons where we in a way have to search for the answers ourselves. He brings them to life and expresses to the reader just how they should really be viewing these â€Å"media machines† who’ve been belittling the Somali pirates. He assumes that the readers are on his side in a way because, he feels that he is including the actual and/or good reasoning behind the Somali pirate tactics. This all goes back to the â€Å"there’s always two sides to every story† quote. He sees his readers as merely looking for the good since they already heard or know about the bad in this situation. Johann Hari includes more of a formal informative type of language towards his audience in this article. The way that he writes his article is towards an audience of a higher education i. e. high school students and up. Because of this he leans on the art of persuasion towards his readers to see the brighter or better side of the story. By doing this he is sort of sugar coating this situation but he expresses it as exposing the truth. When Hari speaks about how â€Å"European ships have been looting Somalia’s seas of their greatest resource: seafood,† he demonstrates a tone of liveliness. This is appropriate for this article because it gives the reader some sort of excitement or thrill to keep them wanting more information on what is going on in this country. His choice of words shows that he puts more of his own emotion in this article than actual evidence that he is trying to elaborate on. This tactic of inputting his emotion in his work was for the sole purpose to show his audience that not everyone who ends up being the â€Å"bad guys† start off that way. Hari tackles the obstacle of repetition of the same information throughout this article. He incorporates new and interesting facts that stick together with the rest of his work in almost every paragraph. An example of this would be when Hari started to indicate the UN’s envoy to Somalia’s stand on what has been occurring in his country. He continues on in the following paragraphs to explain when and where the problems all started. By doing this he is giving his readers a little background information, and this gives the reader some sort of stability when trying to figure out exactly how they feel about what is going on in Somalia. My overall feeling about Johann Hari’s â€Å"You have been lied to about pirates,† is that he accomplishes his goal of persuading his audience to take a different approach in judging the Somali pirates. He made his message clear straight from the title and stuck by that until the end of his article. Yes Hari may have been accused for plagiarism, but when you think about it, what journalist would spend that much time including this much of someone else’s emotion or opinion in his work. This article leaves you thinking no matter how bad things may look for you, there is always someone or something that makes you see the brighter side of things to help you realize the two sides to your story. How to cite Rhetorical Analysis, Papers Rhetorical Analysis Free Essays A Beautiful Piece Of Chalk Analogy, contradiction, and irony are some of the important rhetorical methods that many authors use to portray their ideas. In â€Å"A Piece of Chalk† (1905), G. K. We will write a custom essay sample on Rhetorical Analysis or any similar topic only for you Order Now Chesterton demonstrates his adept writing ability in using those methods as a means of appeal to convey that everything is beautiful and valuable in its own way. His piece of writing not only exemplifies the use of contradiction, humor, analogy and metaphor, but also succeeds in using relevant support and evidence. Initially, the first rhetorical technique that Chesterton uses is contradiction. We sometimes hold prejudiced views, along with implicitly wrong definitions, towards the world. The author first states the falsifications, and then contradicts them by describing the simple, pure, yet undeniable beauty of those notions. Chesterton says about the white color, â€Å"It is not a mere absence of color; it is a shining and affirmative thing, as fierce as red, as definite as black† (133). In the process, the author is able to make his points emphasized. Moreover, he notes in his essay that, â€Å"[v]irtue is not the absence of vices or the avoidance of moral dangers; virtue is a vivid and separate thing, like pain or a particular smell. Mercy does not mean not being cruel, or sparing people revenge or punishment; it means a plain and positive thing like the sun, which one has either seen or not seen† (Chesterton, 133). He continuously talks about the notion that people usually evasively understand as trivial and trite, affirming their grace and charm. Beside contradiction, humor also effectively contributes to his narration. In the first paragraph, Chesterton talks about the conversation between the narrator and the old woman. He came up to look for brown paper for his drawing, but the woman insisted on thinking that he wanted to wrap up parcels. Even when she realized his primary purpose, this kitchen owner still could not capture the value of brown paper to the painter (Chesterton 132). The author also uses humorous phrases such as â€Å"rationale of the existence of brown paper,† â€Å"beyond my mental capacity,† and â€Å"she offered to overwhelm me with note-paper† (Chesterton 132). He dwells on the misunderstanding of the woman, as well as the misconception that many people hold about the little but useful materials around them. In addition, Chesterton says in the last paragraph that, â€Å"Imagine a man in the Sahara regretting that he had no sand for his hour-glass. Imagine a gentleman in mid-ocean wishing that he had brought some salt water with him for his chemical experiments† (134). The narrator states two examples, where people hilariously trick themselves in two simple and obvious situations, to ridicule himself of something that he has just realized to be similar. Added to an effective use of contradiction and humor, Chesterton’s â€Å"A Piece of Chalk† is an exemplary use of analogy and metaphor. He talks about his attitude towards brown paper, â€Å"I then tried to explain the rather delicate logical shade, that I not only liked brown paper, but liked the quality of brownness in paper, just as I like the quality of brownness in October woods, or in beer† (Chesterton, 132). One cannot judge things by their mere look or use, but has to really look into them. Their essences, which were deliberately brought by their creators, are just unique as the passion and devotion of their creators. Similarly, the author says about the old poets, â€Å"They preferred writing about great men to writing about great hills; but they sat on the great hills to write it. They gave out much less about Nature, but they drank in, perhaps, much more. They painted the white robes of their holy virgins with the blinding snow, at which they had stared all day† (133). The old poets not only care and appreciate nature, but also capture it successfully in their own works. In addition, according to his last paragraph, â€Å"[a]nd yet, without any white, my absurd little pictures would be as pointless as the world would be if there were no good people in it† (134), he compares white chalks with good people. And as he talks about using white chalks in painting, the readers understand the values and importance of the existence of good people in this world. In the last sentences of the essay, he says, â€Å"I was sitting on an immense warehouse of white chalk. The landscape was made entirely of white chalk. White chalk was piled more miles until it met the sky† (134). The use of metaphor here enhances his point. By emphasizing how much white chalk is around him, Chesterton skillfully introduces to the readers a seemingly obvious fact that good people are easy to find in the Southern England. Ultimately, with â€Å"A Piece of Chalk,† Chesterton has proven that he is a master of rhetorical techniques. He develops his paper by using different rhetorical methods alternatively and altogether. The story flows peacefully and naturally, yet does not turn boring, because every sentence is a joy to read. Work Cited Chesterton, G. K. â€Å"A Piece of Chalk. † 75 Readings across the Curriculum. Ed. Chris Anson. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006: 132-4. Print. How to cite Rhetorical Analysis, Papers

Artemis Essay Example For Students

Artemis Essay Word Count: 1271Artemis was born of Leto and Zeus, on the island of Delos, later helping with the delivery of her twin brother, Apollo. Some sources state that her actual birthplace is not Delos, but an island called Ortygia. Although the two islands could be one and the same, it is not clear. In helping with the birth of her brother Artemis fulfilled her role as a goddess of childbirth (which she shares with Eileithyia and Hera). She is the goddess of chastity, the hunt and the moon, too. But Ill get more into those later. Artemis was closely linked with her brother. For example, sudden death, particularly of the young, was often attributed to them (Artemis killing the girls and Apollo the boys). In fact, a rather famous legend involves both Artemis and Apollo. The story is told at length by the poet Ovid, in his Metamorphoses. The women of Thebes gave Leto great honor, often offering generous gifts and hymns to her which upset Niobe. After all, She had seven daughters and seven son s, whereas Leto merely had the twins. Besides, she was rich and beautiful, and the queen of Thebes. So Niobe claimed that she deserved the attention and honor more then Leto. Upon hearing this Leto was infuriated. She couldnt believe such blatant hubris, and complained to her two children. To avenge their insulted mother, Apollo and Artemis went to the palace of Thebes and with their unerring shafts, they shot down all 14 of Niobes children (Artemis the girls and Apollo the boys). Niobe was turned to stone and placed atop a mountain. It is said that tears continue to trickle down her marble face, with the grief of her dead children. As the goddess of chastity, Artemis is modest, pure, and virginal. One famous story depicting her chaste nature is the story of Actaeon, also told in Ovids Metamorphoses. Actaeon was a passionate hunter. Out on his hunt, one day, he found himself lost, and stumbled upon Artemis bathing with her nymphs in a stream in the forest. Without her arrows at hand , she flung water over the surprised Actaeon. To ensure that he could never tell of seeing the modest goddess nude, she turned him into a stag. He fled but was hunted and killed by his own hunting hounds. Though severe, Artemis protected her virginal nature (even if it may have been an accident to begin with). Another story in which her purity is protected by her ardent actions was that of Callisto, a follower of Artemis. Callisto, a sworn maid and fervent follower of the goddess, was raped and impregnated by Zeus. Ashamed of what had happened, she withdrew and hid her body. At a time when she had began to show, the goddess requested that Callisto and the nymphs bathe with her in the cool stream. Artemis immediately percieved the girls naked and pregnant figure, and expelled her from her group of followers; she could not be defiled by the company of Callisto. Hera, the wife of Zeus, became angry when she learned of Callisto and her son Arcas, and turned her into a bear. Callisto, la ter nearly hunted by her own son, ignorant of his parentage was saved, and Zeus whisked both into the heavens. They are now the constellations, Callisto, the great bear, and Arcas, the little bear. Constellations also figure into another such story about Artemis. In the story of Orion, he is out hunting when he encounters Artemis. He tries to rape her, and in her fury she makes a scorpion out of the earth to sting him to death. It is said that both can be seen in the night sky now Scorpio the scorpion and Orion the hunter. Orions hunting dog was also turned into the constellation Canis Major, with Sirius as the dog star. The story of Hippolytus, written by the poet Euripides, shows a softer side of the young goddess nature. Hippolytus, an ardent and devoted follower of Artemis, refused to honor the sensual Aphrodite, goddess of lust and physical love. Hippolytus was pure and chaste, and wanted nothing to do with the voluptuous and sex-driven Aphrodite; he honored Artemis foremost. Enraged by the hubris of Hippolytus blatant disregardof her, Aphrodite sought revenge. She made his stepmother, Phaedra, fall desperately in love with him. When Hippolytus found out, he was horrified. Mortified that others might find out, and frustrated by Hippolytus callous and intemperate response to her feelings, Phaedra hanged herself and left a deceitful note saying that Hippolytus had forced himself on her. Hippolytus father, Theseus, upon reading the note found on his dead wife, cursed his son to death (by the sea god Poseidon). In the end the goddess Artemis reveals all to Theseus. Before dying, Hippolytus forgave his father, whose sorrow would haunt him for life. Afterwards Artemis honored Hippolytus with ceremonies held in his honor in Troezen each year. .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6 , .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6 .postImageUrl , .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6 , .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6:hover , .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6:visited , .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6:active { border:0!important; } .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6:active , .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6 .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ua29861b47e64a8b9998c1eb2284221c6:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: My Philosophy of Life EssayArtemis is often confused with both Selene, the moon goddess, and Hecate, goddess of roads, ghosts, witches, and the moon, who is also a fertility goddess. Although Artemis is a virgin, she is depicted as a fertility goddess (Artemis of the Ephesians) like the goddess of childbirth, already cited). The three manifestations of her character as goddess of the moon are Selene in the heavens, Artemis on earth, and Hecate in the underworld. In art, she is often shown with the crescent moon on her crown. Other attributes, not related to the moon, include her bow and arrow, an animal or two by her side, and a torch (to portray the light of birth, life, and fertility). The common perception of the goddess is that of the virgin huntress, regardless of the other conceptions of her. As the daughter of Zeus and Leto, Artemis was an Olympian. Her main vocation was to roam mountain forests and uncultivated land with her faithful nymphs, hunting. As the goddess of childbirth, not only for humans, but for animals too, she not only hunted, but also saw that they were protected and safe, and was responsible for overseeing their reproduction. As for other contradictions to the goddess chaste character, she was seen as the protectress of women in labor, the guardian of small children, and the patron of women in childbirth. But she is said to bring on sudden death while a woman gives birth, which is yet another contradiction in character. For Artemis as a divinity of healing (as was her brother Apollo), another interesting inconsistency is that she was also thought to be responsible for bringing and spreading disease (for example, leprosy, rabies, gout, etc.). Artemis was honored all over the Greek world. In Ephesus, a great temple was even built in her honor, which was l ater named one of the seven wonders of the ancient world. She had two sanctuaries in Sparta as well. Among the epithets given to Artemis were Potnia Theron (mistress of wild animals), Kourotrophos (nurse of youths), Locheia (helper in childbirth), Agrotera (huntress), and Cynthia (taken from Mt. Cynthus on Delos, where she was born). As a goddess, Artemis was pure and divine. Though perhaps rash at times, she was an honorable representation of true chastity and goodness. (Prime source used: Classical Mythologysixth edition, by Morford and Lenardon)Miscellaneous